Two new MPs have signed EDM 22 this week, Tessa Munt MP for Wells and Mike Wood MP for Batley and Spen. These MPs are adding their weight to the urgent call for up-to-date medical evidence to be heard in scientific hearings that will be presented through the platform of properly moderated, public scientific debates, with conditions endorsed by Britain’s foremost human rights defence barrister Michael Mansfield QC.
EDM 22 calls for evidence to be heard which entirely invalidates the continued funding of laboratory animal models, that still continue to receive the lion’s share of research funding – despite the fact that current science now proves animals are falsely claimed able to ‘predict’ the responses of human patients. Recognizing this evidence would mean an immediate abandonment of such experiments, on human medical and scientific grounds. This would then entirely free medical research from the damaging grip of veterinary principles, in which it still finds itself held today.
The statistics highlighted in Parliamentary EDM 22 are reflected by the wider scientific community, including the British Medical Journal, read more.
We’re supporting ‘Time to Hear the Scientific Evidence‘! Please click on the image below and simply type in your post code to ask your MP to sign EDM 22. Help us support politicians who are holding the continued funding of invalid laboratory animal models to effective medical account:
We are delighted to announce that seventy MPs have now signed EDMs 263 and 22, holding misleading laboratory animal models – falsely claimed able to ‘predict’ the responses of human patients – to thorough public scientific account. This is a huge step forward for PCFC as we campaign for the rapid advancement of effective treatments and cures. Brand new Parliamentarians, Dame Anne Begg MP for Aberdeen South; Fabian Hamilton MP for Leeds, North East; Jim Hood MP for Lanark and Hamilton East; Sir Gerald Kaufman MP for Manchester, Gorton and Nigel Dodds MP for Belfast North add their weight to this massive step for human medicine, as it struggles free from the grip of vested interests that still keep it chained to the principles of veterinary medicine.
Both Parliamentary EDMs call for scientists – who still claim that animal models benefit human patients – to participate in properly moderated, public scientific debates with the leading medical Board in its field, Americans and Europeans for Medical Advancement, who provide our evidence.
The question of the falsely claimed predictive value of animal experiments for human patients is increasingly becoming the focus of leading scientific journals, not least of which is the British Medical Journal which published their ‘Editors Choice’ in June 2014, titled ‘How Predictive and Productive is Animal Research?‘ This article concluded by citing the paper it quoted:
“If research conducted on animals continues to be unable to reasonably predict what can be expected in humans, the public’s continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical animal research seems misplaced”.
Further supporting evidence from a wide field of medical expertise is highlighted in our recentnews feed .
Thedebate conditionsfor EDMs 22 and 263 have been endorsed by Britain’s foremost human rights defence barrister Michael Mansfield QC . The EDMs’ call for debates is unique because a panel of judges will be present who will include experts from the fields of clinical medicine, complexity/chaos theory, philosophy of science, evolutionary biology, clinical research, drug development, and basic research. The debate conditions are specifically designed to achieve a scientific result which can be submitted as evidence in a wider legal action as well as to government bodies, in order to change now demonstrably outdated laws.
PLEASE ASK YOUR MP TO SIGN EDM 22. We’re supporting ‘Time to hear the Scientific Evidence‘, which is helping to accelerate constituents access to their MPs. Please click on the image below simply type in your post code and send your letter today.
We’re supporting MPs who are signing Parliamentary EDM 22, calling for the continued funding of animal experiments – claimed as able to ‘predict’ the responses of human patients – to be held to public scientific account in properly moderated, medical debates with the leading scientific Board in its field, Americans and Europeans for Medical Advancement, which provides our evidence. ‘Time to Hear the Scientific Evidence‘ has been launched to accelerate the support for MPs who are joining other politicians calling for this medical evidence to be heard without delay. The conditions for this hearing have been endorsed by Britain’s foremost human rights defence barrister Michael Mansfield QC.
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) Editors Choice, published in June 2014, reflects the statistics highlighted by MPs in Parliamentary EDM 22. The BMJ’s article titled ‘How Predictive and Productive is Animal Research?’concludes by quoting from the paper it cited:
“If research conducted on animals continues to be unable to reasonably predict what can be expected in humans, the public’s continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical animal research seems misplaced”.
Help us hold this ‘misplaced funding’ of animal experiments – falsely claimed as able to ‘predict’ the responses of human patients – to thorough scientific account. Please ask your MP to sign EDM 22, visit ‘Time to Hear the Scientific Evidence‘, or click on the image below; simply type in your post code and send a letter to your MP today!
The Editor in Chief at the British Medical Journal recently highlighted the failure of laboratory animal models in her Editors Choice, June 2014: How predictive and productive is animal research? This article concluded by quoting from the paper it cited:
“If research conducted on animals continues to be unable to reasonably predict what can be expected in humans, the public’s continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical animal research seems misplaced.” Read the article.
Senior scientists involved in medical research are additionally speaking out about a key financial aspect and the pressure placed on them to blur the distinction between ‘basic research’ – which is curiosity driven and makes no claim to apply to human patients – and ‘applied research’, which is funded on the premise that it will lead to effective new treatments for human patients. Senior cancer investigator and Director of Research of the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Dr Jim Woodgett comments on this following an article in Nature:(scroll down to 5th comment):
‘When we publish our studies in mouse models, we are encouraged to extrapolate to human relevance. This is almost a requirement of some funding agencies and certainly a pressure from the press in reporting research progress. When will this enter the clinic? The problem is an obvious one. If the scientific (most notably, biomedical community) does not take ownership of the problem, then we will be held to account. If we break the “contract” with the funders (a.k.a. tax payers), we will lose not only credibility but also funding…Building only on solid foundations was a principle understood by the ancient Greeks and Egyptians yet we are building castles on the equivalent of swampland. No wonder clinical translation fails so often’.
Pharmaceutical companies acknowledge the failure of animal models in their drug development process and write about this openly and often in the scientific literature, visit this link to read extensive and referenced examples.
Trans-Species ModelingTheory now explains all of the above, by placing many decades of practical examples, illustrating the failure of animal models to predict the responses of human patients, within the context of current understanding of evolutionary biology and complexity. Read more from the leading medical Board in its field Americans and Europeans for Medical Advancement (AFMA/EFMA).
Well, I guess I should start by saying “Happy New Year” to you all. Personally, I find this time of year quite hard. Everything seems to go flat after all the celebrations of Christmas and new year, the weather isn’t very good, and everyone seems to take the whole month to catch up with stuff they didn’t get time to do over Christmas. Also, my volunteer work doesn’t start until March, So I don’t get to go out much.
I am supposed to be keeping this blog positive, but I have decided to be more reflective this month. It seems appropriate for this time of year. Firstly, looking back on last year and what we achieved in getting this campaign up and running. We got a lot of interest from MPs and the public, and from you all lovely readers of this blog and viewers of this website. All in all, things have got off to a great start and I am confident that things will continue to go from strength to strength this year.
Looking forward to this year, I hope we will get more interest from MPs and that more will start to follow our campaign and get involved. I also hope that our scientific debates will get underway, and that scientists who don’t understand where we are coming from at the moment, will see and hear the evidence for themselves, and will come round to our way of thinking and join our campaign. What I hope most of all for this year though, is that we will continue to grow as an organisation and more people will be made aware of the huge dis-service that is being done to the animals who are suffering as a result of being experimented on and to us, the patients who are having to take drugs, that we know are potentially very dangerous.
The public relations company for the animal model community ‘Understanding Animal Research’ (UAR) has published a letter on twitter objecting to our petition. We find this extraordinary: UAR have repeatedly and publicly agreed to participate in a public scientific debate organised by the science-based campaign ‘For Life On Earth’ (FLOE), with the highly qualified medical experts at Europeans For Medical Advancement (EFMA), whose sole scientific focus addresses the false claim that results from experiments on laboratory animal models can be applied to ‘predict’ the responses of human patients in medical research. After 12 months, UAR still have not been able to supply the name of their main speaker for this event which is delaying the debate indefinitely. As finding effective cures and saving lives is the issue, we are astonished why their problem is not one of too many names, rather than none at all. By agreeing to a debate organised by FLOE, whose evidence is illustrated exclusively by the experts at EFMA, UAR are surely aware that the subject of the debate motion could only focus on EFMA’s clearly stated sole scientific concern: namely their opposition to the claim that animal experiments are able to ‘predict’ the responses of humans.
PLEASE BUY THE FAQS SCIENCE BOOK on the right, below! Especially written and accessible for the non-scientist or lay person, it answers all your questions in an easy to read Q and A format. Pictured left is the seminal work suitable for a scientist with a doctorate, founded on Darwin’s great Theory of Evolution: Animal Models in Light of Evolution Shanks PhD and Greek MD BrownWalker 2009.
Hello readers, welcome to my blog. I will start of by telling you a little about myself. My name is Rebecca Groves, I’m 26 and live in Cornwall. I have multiple sclerosis, and am the founder and director of Patients Campaigning For Cures (PCFC).
Patients Campaigning For Cures is a non-profit organisation, set up to increase awareness of the dangers to human beings of taking drugs that have been tested on animals, and to encourage scientific public debate about this hugely important issue. At the moment, drugs that are intended for use on humans, are tested on animals first, to see if they appear safe. This method is not only over 100 years out of date, but has been scientifically proven that it does not work and is dangerous to humans. There are several reasons for this, firstly, animal bodies are completely different to humans and do not react to drugs in the same way that humans do. Also, often the animals that the drugs are tested on do not get the disease that a specific drug is meant to treat. For example, drugs that are designed to help MS patients like myself, are tested on rats. Rats do not naturally get MS. Rats are given things that imitate the symptoms of MS, and then given the drug in question and monitored to see how they react to it. Even if the rats do not react badly to the drug, it in no way proves that it is safe for human use, our bodies are just way too different.
The purpose of this blog is two-fold, the first reason for writing it is to raise awareness of our non-profit organisation and keep our supporters updated with our progress, and the second reason for writing this blog is to give people an insight into what it is like to live with MS. MS is a hard illness to live with, it affects various aspects of your life, from your mobility to your ability to swallow. The reason for this is that your central nervous systems controls pretty much everything your body does, and in someone with MS, their central nervous system is being attacked by your immune system and lesions are formed in your brain and spinal cord.
MS is a very complex disease and affects sufferers in different ways, although there are some symptoms that sufferers have in common, like fatigue. It is also very unpredictable and you never know how you will feel from one day to the next. This makes planning things very difficult. I try and get round this by making two sets of plans. For example, say I had planned to meet a friend for coffee, but I woke up and I wasn’t feeling well enough to go out, instead of cancelling it completely, I would ring my friend and say that I wasn’t well enough to go out, but they could come round to my house for a coffee, that way, I am not letting people down so much and I still get to see my friends. Sometimes the fatigue can be so bad, that just getting up and dressed can make you so exhausted, that you have to have a sleep straight after. Also, you never wake up feeling refreshed, you wake up feeling like you haven’t been to sleep, even when you have slept for 12 hours! I often feel guilty about spending so much time asleep but there is nothing I can do about it. I have been called lazy in the past, which I find very hurtful, as I am not at all lazy.
Another symptom I struggle with daily is pain. Although the amount of pain I get varies from day to day, there is never a single day where I don’t have any pain. I have some amount of pain 24/7, and no painkillers will take it away. The pain isn’t just in one place either, it is all over my body, there is not a single part of my body that doesn’t hurt! The type of pain varies too, sometimes it’s a dull ache, sometimes it’s like pins and needles, other times it’s an intense burning, and sometimes some of my limbs are completely numb. This makes daily tasks very difficult. For example when my hands hurt or are numb, I struggle to do really simple things like use a knife and fork or hold the phone. Personal care such as getting showered and dressed becomes really hard, that’s why I don’t wear things with buttons, as I often can’t do them up and one of the reasons I keep my hair very short, is so that I don’t have to worry about doing anything with it.
Well, talking of pain, my hands are now getting too painfully to type, so am going to have to finish up here for this entry. Thanks for reading and I will update you all soon.
The medical Board which provides our evidence has named Trans-Species Modeling Theory (TSMT) which is similar in significance to The Germ Theory of Disease and The Theory of Evolution . Like all great scientific theories, TSMT places many decades of observed practical examples – in our case the failure of results from experiments on laboratory animal models to predict responses in human patients – within a wider context, in our case current understanding of evolutionary biology and complexity, in order to explain exactly how and why those practical examples always have, and always will, occur.
Some organisations, who focus on the suffering of laboratory animals, ignore this current scientific evidence and continue to call for more comparative studies between animal tests and human biology based tests. Others suggest that we need more data to prove this position. Others suggest that only recently has enough data been available to stop experimenting on dogs only. This does not help Patients Campaigning for Cures. A critique entitled The Ethical the Implications for Humans in Light of the Poor Predictive Value of Animal Models, published in August 2014 in The International Journal of Clinical Medicine summarizes such positions as ‘scientifically unsustainable and unethical’. We hereby call upon the organisations who continue to hold these positions to please familiarize themselves with Trans-Species Modeling Theory and the Resources page at AFMA/EFMA, so that they can start to help Patients Campaigning For Cures at the earliest, not latest, opportunity.
MPs are signing Early Day Motions to show their support for the urgent need for properly moderated, public scientific debate about the continued claim that the results of experiments on laboratory animal models are able to find effective new treatments for human patients and thereby save human lives. The conditions for these public scientific debates have been endorsed by Britain’s leading human rights defence barrister Michael Mansfield QC.The medical experts who provide our evidence will represent our position in the debate, and their opposition will be provided by a scientist from the animal experimentation community’s public relation’s group ‘Understanding Animal Research’ (UAR).
PLEASE HELP US! At the time of writing, UAR still have not been able to submit the name of the scientist who will be their main speaker at this event, and this is delaying the debate indefinitely. Please ask your MP to sign EDM 22 and help us speed up the realization of this vital debate. Visit EDM 22’s facebook page where you’ll find steps 1-4 guiding you through everything you’ll need to locate your MP and send a template letter ask him/her to support this life saving initiative.
We use essential and necessary cookies to make our website work. We also use additional cookies to help us understand who is visiting our site and to make improvements. We also use other cookies that link to other sites to help deliver content. View our Cookie Notice AcceptReject Non-essentialCookie settings
Manage consent
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
